Keeping it simple

Spent most of the morning in a session looking at a CMS for recruitment which is being deployed on our website and intranet site this quarter. Couple of points for me. One – hadn’t realised how excited I am about CMS. Sad I know but never met a CMS that I didn’t want to interrogate with questions on keywords, search, T7Cs etc. Secondly, it pained me that we spend so much time on tweaking systems with workflows that may happen once in a million occurrences. I suppose its good that we attempt to cater for the quirks of users/publishers, but these ‘refinements’ make it so much harder to deploy as a simple, efficient system.

Letting me down

Is it just me or is the reputation of search on public search engines now getting the same reputation as internal applications? Saw an item on the BBC site on Friday. Searched for it last night and it doesn’t appear anywhere. Also found the search on Youtube and Google is letting me down more and more. I know it’s out there but just can’t find it.

 

Maybe part of the problem is I’m far more aware of what content exists externally and far more demanding of the search engine to present it to me. The same issue as internal search applications I suspect.

 

Maybe the answer is the same. Content will be found if it wants to be found – i.e. there is some monetary value to the publisher that this is found and resource/budget is invested accordingly. Any of the collaboration or networking sites just have to accept the same fate as many intranet sites that have little or no resource for search.

Into the future

Nearly the end of the working year so doing some musing over the last decade in the world of knowledge and intranets. We’ve seen:

  • the rise of crowd power – crowdsourcing
  • people’s ability to use online for their own ends
  • the growth of Google
  • broadband
  • explosion of content generation
  • social networks
  • anytime, anywhere intranets
  • rss feeds
  • blogs – then bite-sized remarks through Twitter
  • cloud computing 

What will be the trends for the next decade? For me its lies somewhere around mobile and location-based services. Local may regain its popularity, rather than global (I think we already start to see this in terms of knowledge); intranets will become the workplace of tomorrow – energy efficient practices will keep more people away from the physical workplace; we will also see the demise of traditional websites and intranets as content looks for channels and audience rather than defined databases.

The two trends for me will be governance and community.

Governance – how well do we want the space governed – in terms of trust, authentication and validation?

Community – we must excel in finding, developing and enhancing communities and learn how to gain mutual value from them. This will focus more around people than technology. We should see the digital channels as not another way to distribute content. Our online experiences should revolve around building community and collaboration, rather than the production and consumption of content. 

Creating the right situation for Knowledge to flourish

A fundamental mistake we often make when judging other people is assuming that their behaviour mainly reflects their personality. Unfortunately this ignores another major influence on how people behave staring us right in the face: the situation.

Our personalities certainly have an influence on what situations we get into and how we deal with them, but situational factors — even relatively subtle ones — can completely obliterate the effects of personality.

Don’t take my word for it, though, consider a modern take on an ancient bible story from social psychologists Darley & Batson (1973)http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/27/1/100/

What these figures show is the large effect that subtle aspects of the situation have on the way people behave.

How does this effect Knowledge Sharing (KS). We can’t just assume people do or do not want to share. In many cases it’s the situation which provides the hurdle. One of the positive aspects of a current KS community project is that actions are being taken to create a situation which encourages and supports KS. Finnace codes are being added to include KS while key influencers are being recruited within the community so the wider community can see KS coming from the leadership.

The old adage that a person can be judged on their actions isn’t the whole truth. Often people’s behaviour, and our own, may say very little about our personalities and much more about the complexities of the situation in which we find ourselves. These small changes help create the right situation for KS to flourish. 

.

Rich App, Poor App

 

One of our departments, with deep pockets so it would appear, has just produced a slick, flash (in terms of look and technology) Contact Card ??? enabling internet users to see ???who does what??? in that department. Announced with great fanfare it looks neat, does its job and ticks a box ??? but it leaves me uneasy. It has no integration with the employee directory (where their listings still appear with old photos ??? rather than the high resolution in the Contact Card). Its sits on a server that is not picked up by our search and it doesn???t talk to our ???peoplesoft??? systems. Other departments are now asking for something similar but it???s unsustainable, in terms of budget and production.

 

I fear one of the effects of the recession has been the growing divide of a two tier knowledge offering. Those departments with budget produce something pretty, but it has little impact on the overall development of a knowledge sharing platform. The divide between a national health care system and private system springs to mind. Although we should applaud the innovation, or spending budget on it, it can???t be scaled to include whole organisation without a great demand for budget and resource. Would a better approach have been to collectively look at how we can improve the contact systems throughout the organisation? There would have been little fanfare for this but the greater good would be achieved. However, would such a project ever have got off the ground? In these economically uncertain times there are great opportunities to showcase something new (as there is very little competition) but whether it has any lasting value is another matter.

Getting straight to the point

One of the popular features we added to our new intranet template is the ability to create a ‘friendly’ URL to a content page (I’ve also seen this described as a ‘direct URL’; ‘vanity URL’; ‘short name URL’ etc). It allows the content publisher to set-up a URL which makes sense to the user, rather than be left to the complexities of the technology infrastructure to create the URL. 

 

One of the results this function is the increasing ‘seeding’ of these URLs in other channels other than the intranet. Email is a prime example. Word documents, powerpoints, Excel etc all now have friendly URLs appearing in there – allowing intranet content to migrate seamlessly across our applications. Looking at the latest metrics nearly 1500 pages were used as entry point to intranet content. I blogged previously of the decreasing value of the homepage. We can see intranet behaviour now mirroring the external world where seeding of content is now far more important than trying to attract traffic to a corporate website. Publishing on the intranet is not enough. Its how and where you seed it that counts.

 

Social Media on Intranets Live

Number 6 on my Intranets Live Top 10 was ‘social media’. Some notes I made include:
  • Two important currencies of the web – trust and attention
  • Social media tools areeasier to activate than adopt
  • Integrate social media with what the organisation is doing on a day-to-day basis.
  • What is the value and benefit of these tools? People with little interest in IT begin to engage
  • What are the security issues around this? Data protection, search, data loss, threat of reputation
  • Every organisation needs a social media participation policy
  • Are we creating a technology democracy – freedom of speech inside the workplace? Or is this just a myth. Things that matter, employee rights etc are rarley on the agenda for social media.
  • Is there greater engagement in organisation that already have employee forums within their structure (trade unions, employee councils etc)?

To love or to loathe?

Had a meeting today with one of our Knowledge stakeholders, responsible, among many other things, for their community area on our intranet. She appeared down and upset. Upon asking why she told me the community’s annual conference was held last week. At the conference, a senior director in the community used his speaking slot to verbally attack an area of the community site. He used ‘Amazon’ as an example of what was needed (along with their budget I hope!). Without seeking any guidance or counsel from the community stakeholders he broadcast what he wanted. Recent research of the community (an online poll which nearly 50% of the community responded) didn’t support this view. The comments made also highlighted a known area of weakness which was to be addressed by the community stakeholder when resource allows.

 

Do we love or loath this man? Personally I love him! Why? At a high profile meeting, in front of the whole community, he mentioned the community intranet site. Although he didn’t do any research or collected evidence he also spoke about a known weakness of the site. I could also applaud him for using Amazon as an example and not the BBC but that’s another matter.

 

Why love him? His has given us the visibility, platform and audience to address this issue now. He also provides us a path into senior members of the community to gain resource to address the issue. He’s talked the talk in front of his community. Now he needs to walk the walk. The community stakeholder, although upset, has arranged a session for us all to look at the way forward on this. Involving the attacker means he now has input, responsibility and a personal interest in getting something done.

 

Do you agree we should love him?

 

Leave it to the gatekeeper

Just reading a piece by Linda Stone, who coined the term “continuous partial attention” to describe the state of today’s knowledge workers, regarding “email apnea”: the unconscious suspension of regular and steady breathing when you tackle your email.

There are even claims that the relentless cascade of information lowers people’s intelligence. We pay a high price as we struggle to deal with information of limited value.

A study by Microsoft found that once their work had been interrupted by email notification, people took, on average, 24 minutes to return to the suspended task.

The answer to this? In an ongoing knowledge sharing project for our largest community, a key element is to define and enhance the role of the Knowledge gatekeeper – the head of this ‘sharing/networking/communicating’ community. Its almost Zen-like. We have to let go of the need to know everything completely. Trust your community, and particularly the gatekeeper of a community to filter and flow the right things to you when you need to know them. It really is turning back the clock. We should no-longer feel we need to know and connect to everyone but have faith (a key word) that the community gatekeeper will guide the relevant content as and when its needed.

What happened to search?

Search made my Top 10 lists of Intranets Live. My notes on this included:

  • Look at the users, reach, security and scale
  • We all have the same challenges of defining the users intent
  • We are facing wider data sources – video, audio etc – both inside and outside the firewall
  • There appears little resource given to search
  • Taxonomies are almost never mentioned when we talk about search, Are we seeing the death of taxonomies?
  • Potential 2 tier intranet – one covered by search and one which is a ‘wild west’ of content. Will this create confusion for the user?